Charities caught misusing donations: five documented cases show how millions in donor money funded luxury cars, fake meals, and executive perks.
By Rocci J. Stucci | 9 min read | Published July 5, 2026 Rocci Stucci is founder of Stucci Media and host of The Rocci Stucci Show, covering consumer protection and public accountability stories since 2014.
Article Covers
Charities caught misusing donations rarely admit it on their own. Instead, the warning comes from a federal complaint, a criminal indictment, or a reporter who pulled the tax filings apart line by line. Over the past 15 years, regulators exposed nonprofits that collected hundreds of millions of dollars from generous donors. As a result, most of that money never reached the people it was meant to help. Below are five documented cases of charities that misused donations, what happened in each, and what donors should watch for before they give.
This remains one of the largest charity fraud actions the FTC has ever brought. Even now, it serves as a reference point for how the IRS reviews nonprofit filings before granting or renewing tax-exempt 501(c)(3)status.
Few charities carry more public trust than veterans' groups. That's exactly why the Wounded Warrior Project story hit so hard. In January 2016, a CBS News investigation featured more than 40 former employees describing lavish staff conferences and travel. For example, tax filings showed conference and meeting spending jumped from $1.7 million in 2010 to $26 million in 2014. That $26 million matched what the charity spent that same year on combat stress recovery for veterans.
At the time, Charity Navigator estimated that only about 60 percent of the charity's budget reached veterans directly. By contrast, Fisher House put 91 percent toward veterans, and the Disabled American Veterans Charitable Service Trust hit 96 percent. Wounded Warrior Project disputed those numbers and said 80.6 percent of spending went to programs. Even so, the board fired CEO Steven Nardizzi and COO Al Giordano in March 2016, following an independent review by the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
It's worth noting that a 2017 Washington Post report later found the independent review had not confirmed every allegation. Since then, Wounded Warrior Project has restructured its finances. It now reports that roughly three-quarters of spending reaches veteran programs directly. Still, the case proves a scandal doesn't always mean outright theft. Sometimes it means a charity lost sight of its own priorities, and only public pressure forced a fix.
Not every group on this list was even a real charity in practice. Feeding Our Future, a Minnesota nonprofit founded in 2016, was meant to pass federal Child Nutrition Program funds to groups feeding kids during the pandemic. Instead, according to the Department of Justice, its leaders built dozens of shell companies and invented meal sites that claimed to serve thousands of children a day.
In fact, prosecutors say the scheme pulled in more than $240 million using fake attendance rosters. Those rosters, in fact, listed children who never received a single meal. Founder Aimee Bock and co-defendant Salim Said were convicted at trial in 2025 on multiple counts of wire fraud, bribery, and conspiracy. Meanwhile, dozens of additional defendants have pleaded guilty or been convicted in the broader case. Federal officials now estimate total fraud tied to the scheme could top $350 million. Bock was later sentenced to more than 41 years in prison, one of the harshest penalties ever handed down in a nonprofit fraud case.
Because it exploited a government reimbursement program instead of private donations, Feeding Our Future is a reminder that public relief funds routed through nonprofits need just as much scrutiny as direct charitable giving.
WonderWork, a New York nonprofit that funded eye surgeries abroad, looked like a donor favorite for years. Behind the scenes, however, an independent examiner's report told a different story. According to CharityWatch's reporting, CEO Brian Mullaney kept a separate payroll ledger to hide personal expenses and unreported bonus income. Mullaney earned a base salary of $475,000. At the same time, he failed to report roughly $700,000 in bonus pay to the IRS between 2012 and 2015.
The examiner concluded that WonderWork's fundraising campaigns misled donors about how their money would be used. At the same time, its accounting system failed to properly track that money once it arrived. Mullaney resigned in 2017 amid the allegations. As a result, the examiner referred the case to the New York Attorney General's office for further review. As a result, WonderWork's board brought in new leadership and rebuilt its financial controls from scratch.
Not every scheme here involved cash. Geraldine and Clayton Hill ran a California nonprofit called On Your Feet, Inc. The group claimed to help low-income families get clothing and household goods. According to the Department of Justice, the Hills convinced major companies, including Forever 21 and Brooks Sports, to donate millions in merchandise. They promised it would go directly to families in need.
Instead, the couple resold much of that inventory to discount outlets and kept the cash. For instance, prosecutors say the money bought a $124,000 Mercedes, family vacations, and rent on a seven-bedroom home. Meanwhile, the Hills falsified pay stubs and tax filings to hide their real income. Both were sentenced to federal prison in 2020 and ordered to pay restitution to the IRS.
On paper, every charity above filed properly with the IRS. At least on paper, each one told donors a version of its mission that sounded legitimate. So what separated these five cases from an honest nonprofit? The answer is oversight. Independent audits, board members willing to ask hard questions, and regulators paying attention to filings that didn't add up all played a role. In fact, most of these schemes ran for years before anyone caught them. That's because donors rarely check a charity's finances before giving.
That gap between good intentions and real accountability is exactly what watchdog groups like CharityWatch and Charity Navigator exist to close. For that reason, federal regulators keep bringing new charity fraud cases every year.
How can I check if a charity is legitimate before donating? For example, look up the group's IRS Form 990 through the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search tool. Then cross-check its rating on CharityWatch or Charity Navigator before giving.
What percentage of donations should go to actual programs? Most watchdogs treat 65 percent or more of total spending on programs as a reasonable benchmark. Still, the right figure varies by a charity's size and mission.
Is Wounded Warrior Project still considered a legitimate charity? Yes. After its 2016 leadership shakeup, Wounded Warrior Project restructured its spending. It now reports a much higher share of its budget going to veteran programs, though donor groups still watch its overhead closely.
What happened to the money stolen in the Feeding Our Future case? As of early 2025, investigators had recovered only a fraction of the more than $250 million allegedly stolen. Instead, much of it was spent on unrecoverable items or moved into overseas assets.
Can I get my donation back if a charity turns out to be fraudulent? Generally, no. Even so, victims can file complaints with the FTC, their state attorney general, or the IRS, which sometimes leads to restitution as part of a criminal case.
Where do I report a charity I suspect is misusing donations? Donors can file a complaint with the FTC's Complaint Assistant, their state's charity regulator, or the IRS Tax Exempt Organizations division.
Charities caught misusing donations share one trait: they counted on donors never checking the numbers. A five-minute search of a charity's IRS filing and watchdog rating catches most red flags before a single dollar changes hands. Generosity shouldn't require blind trust. Once again, none of the organizations above earned it.
If you know of a charity or nonprofit misusing donations right now, whether it's a local group, a national name, or something dressed up as disaster relief, contact Stucci Media at Rocci@StucciMedia.com. We will look into it. Too many organizations have built a business model out of preying on people's worst days, and we're done watching it happen quietly. Send us what you've got. We'll take it from there.
Maria Eduarda, 21, died after workers at Brazil's Skeleton Bridge threw her 130 feet without attaching her safety rope. Three are arrested. The full story.
Uncover the radical left plot behind the White House Correspondents Dinner shooting 2026. Stucci Media exposes the chilling manifesto and security failures.
Shocking VCU nurse ICE sabotage videos urge drugging and poisoning federal agents—now under police investigation and on administrative leave at VCU Health. Full details on the viral scandal.
New details in the Ohio dentist murder investigation reveal a chilling "insider" plot. Read about the arrest of Dr. Michael McKee and the evidence found.
Dive into the Milwaukee judge guilty obstruction verdict—Hannah Dugan faces prison for blocking ICE in a courthouse showdown. Trump's win on immigration enforcement exposed. | Stucci Media
Dive into the Texas A&M student death of Brianna Aguilera—mother's foul play claims, ignored texts, and a prosecutor's push for Austin police to investigate deeper. Justice demands answers.
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.
